America's Christian History

U.S. Constitution Page

 The Constitution and the Bill of Rights from a Christian Perspective

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare

Rebuilders Publications Opportunities Contact Us

    Spotlight    


 Today in History   

 Poetry                 

 History                

 The Constitution   

 Principle Approach

 Politics                

 Home School       

 Creative Writing    


 Ask Dorothy...           

 Links                         

 Resources              

 Guest book               

 

Tell A Friend!

Type In Your Name:

Type In Your E-mail:

Your Friend's E-mail:

Your Comments:

Receive copy: 

CONSTITUTIONAL MYTHS AND REALITIES

Myth 1

by Stephen Markman

Justice, Michigan Supreme Court

 

Note: The following is the first of several excerpts from a dissertation on the Constitution "reprinted by permission from Imprimis, the national speech digest of Hillsdale College, www.hillsdale.edu."  Professor Markman has written an excellent article about some of the things folks have been told about our Constitution.  I think you will enjoy his insights which you could use to help neutralize the arguments of those who are trying to destroy it.  You will find a short biography of Justice Markman at the end of this installment.

 

The United States has enjoyed unprecedented liberty, prosperity and stability, in large part because of its Constitution.  I would like to discuss a number of myths or misconceptions concerning that inspired document.

 

Myth or Misconception 1: Public policies of which we approve are constitutional and public policies of which we disapprove are unconstitutional.

 

It might be nice if those policies that we favor were compelled by the Constitution and those policies that we disfavor were barred by the Constitution.  But this is not, by and large, what the Constitution does.   Rather, the Constitution creates an architecture of government that is designed to limit the abuse of governmental power.  The delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 sought to create a government that would be effective in carrying out its essential tasks, such as foreign policy and national defense, while not coming to resemble those European governments with which they were so familiar, where the exercise of governmental power was arbitrary and without limits.  Therefore, while the Constitution constrains government, it does not generally seek to replace the representative processes of government.

 

Governments may, and often do, carry out unwise public policies without running afoul of the Constitution.  As a Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court, I often uphold policies that have been enacted in the state legislature, or by cities and counties and townships, that I believe are unwise.  But lack of wisdom is not the test for what is or is not constitutional, and lack of wisdom is not what allows me-a judge, not the adult supervisor of society-to exercise the enormous power of judicial review and strike down laws that have been enacted by "we the people" through their elected representatives.  Redress for unwise public policies must generally come as the product of democratic debate and at the ballot box, not through judicial correction.

This short biography of the author comes from the same issue of Imprimis.  STEPHEN MARKMAN, who teaches constitutional law at Hillsdale College, was appointed by Governor John Engler in 1999 as Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court and subsequently elected to that position.  Prior to that he served as United States Attorney in Michigan (appointed by President George H. W. Bush); Assistant Attorney General of the United States (appointed by President Ronald Reagan), in which position he coordinated the federal judicial selection process; Chief Counsel of the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution; and Deputy Chief Counsel of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee.  Justice Markman has written for numerous legal journals, including the Stanford Law Review, the University of Chicago Law Review, the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform and the Harvard journal of Law & Public Policy.  The above is adapted from a speech delivered on April 29, 2003, at a Hillsdale College National Leadership Seminar in Dearborn, Michigan.

 

Here is the second installment Constitutional Myths and Realities Myths 2, 3 & 4

 


Post a Review

Want to comment on this article?  We value your input

Please send us your comments and if you wish, a link to your site or a link to another page that supports your views and we'll post your valued input here. 

Online Review Form
Enter  your name

Enter the article  you want to review

Enter your E-mail address

Rate it: 5 Stars is the Highest Rating:
1


 

 


Home

NEW

Correspondence Course

The Bill of Rights

You and the Bill of Rights

Teusy - The little mouse that almost missed the ark

Teusy


The Governor's Story
The Governor's Story

The constitution
You, Your Child and the Constitution


Inspirational Literature

The Siege of Shah Island

 

Heartwarming Poetry

Where is Beauty

 

The Pilgrims

How The Pilgrims Came

 

Grammar

A Guide to Teaching Grammar using the Principle Approach

 

With Liberty and Justice for All

 

Creative Writing

Creative Writing and the Essay

 

 

Copyright 2006 Rebuilders of the Foundations of America's Christian History